Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Equipment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ballston Spa board authorizes contingent interest in $785,996 fire pumper; trustees ask for more review

Village Board of Trustees, Ballston Spa · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board authorized the mayor to execute paperwork showing interest in a Bulldog Fire Apparatus pre‑build pumper costing $785,996 but asked for attorney and chief review and clarity on permissive‑referendum timing before a final purchase.

The Ballston Spa Village Board on June 8 discussed a proposal to show interest in the pre‑build of a custom pumper from Bulldog Fire Apparatus totaling $785,996 (including a $70,000 equipment mounting allowance). The mayor asked trustees to authorize execution of a document that would reserve availability while making the purchase contingent on attorney review and the outcome of permissive‑referendum windows.

Several trustees said they had not received the proposal in time to evaluate it properly and asked for more time to consult with the village attorney and Fire Chief Crow. One trustee said they were uncomfortable acting on a purchase of this magnitude without fuller review; the mayor acknowledged short notice and offered to contact Bulldog and the chief to clarify contingencies, financing and bond counsel costs that would be wrapped into the total.

The proposed pre‑build is described in the meeting materials as a Fouch Brothers FB94 custom pumper with an equipment mounting allowance, totaling $785,996; the mayor said bond counsel and bonding costs would also be factors in the final authorization. Because the vendor requested a hold on availability, the mayor asked the board to allow staff and counsel to refine any contingency language and return the matter for final action. Trustees noted relevant referendum timing: permissive‑referendum and statutory waiting periods affect when an executed interest might be converted into a binding purchase.

No final purchase vote was taken; the board approved authorizing the mayor to execute an interest document after attorney review and Chief review, with the understanding that final approval and financing arrangements would return for a subsequent meeting.