Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Future Land Use Map topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission leans to connect mixed‑use corridors, asks staff for parcel data
Summary
At a June 10 work session, planning staff asked the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission for direction on seven contested areas of a draft future land use map; commissioners generally favored extending mixed‑use corridor designations and asked staff for parcel‑level vacancy, ownership and hazard data before finalizing changes.
Planning staff asked the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission on June 10 to weigh in on seven disputed areas of a draft future land use map, and commissioners signaled they favored expanding several mixed‑use corridors while requesting more parcel‑level information.
Chris, the staff presenter, reminded the commission of the map legend and flagged areas where residential parcels sit between commercial corridors. “Yellow is the city neighborhood … the red is the city mixed‑use corridor,” Chris said while showing the map and asking whether staff should connect segmented corridor parcels.
Commissioners questioned several site‑specific anomalies, including a triangular parcel that appears to be a remnant from an earlier survey, lots with double frontage and parcels that are zoned business but currently used as residences. Commissioner Court asked whether rezoning would still require a public hearing, and staff confirmed a rezoning application would go through planning and zoning and the assembly and that the comprehensive plan is a guidance document rather than a binding approval.
Several members expressed safety and hazard concerns for low‑lying parcels. Commissioners noted some parcels fronting Lower Milbay Road likely fall in an inundation zone and said business uses may be preferable to housing in those locations. Staff said they would check GIS and ownership records and return with information on whether parcels are vacant, the existing uses on each lot and whether access requires easements.
On other areas, the commission discussed whether privately held residential lots adjacent to a Salvation Army property should be designated as a campus or as part of a mixed‑use corridor; several commissioners favored mixed‑use for the area because the privately held lots are not clearly part of a cohesive campus. Commissioners agreed to retain a larger campus designation near an elementary school and the Baptist mission where ownership and uses are already concentrated.
Staff also proposed two overlays for the draft map: a hazard overlay to flag inundation, flood and landslide risk and a future‑planning overlay intended to guide village‑scale code or zoning studies. Staff said the hazard overlay would prompt closer scrutiny of proposals for higher‑density residential development in identified risk areas; commissioners supported adding the overlays.
The commission did not adopt final map amendments at the session and directed staff to return with parcel‑level vacancy, ownership and current‑use data, and with GIS verification for unclear lot boundaries, before the next substantive review.
