Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Emigration Canyon commission approves three‑lot subdivision amid neighbors' objections
Summary
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission approved a three‑lot subdivision at 1128–1162 North Pinecrest Canyon Road (SUB2025‑001345) with additional conditions after neighbors raised concerns about alleged trespass, unfinished retaining walls and sediment entering a creek; the approval includes a tax‑clearance requirement and prohibits septic and slope‑protection waivers on the plat.
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission approved a three‑lot subdivision application (SUB2025‑001345) for property at 1128–1162 North Pinecrest Canyon Road on Dec. 11, 2025, with staff‑recommended conditions and one additional restriction that septic drainage fields and slope‑protection waivers not be approved as part of the plat. Commissioner Jodi Geroux moved to approve the plat; Commissioner Andrew Wallace seconded, and the commissioners voted unanimously in favor.
Applicant Evan Glassman said he is a fine‑art and design professional rather than a housing developer and presented artwork to illustrate the proposed development. Planner Justin Smith introduced the application, noting the parcel is 1.68 acres in zone FR‑1 and that staff had reviewed the proposal against applicable codes and ordinances.
Several nearby residents spoke in opposition or with concerns during the public‑comment portion. Amy Cutting read a statement on behalf of herself and neighboring property owners. Laura Gray said she agreed with Cutting and raised multiple concerns: she asked whether a required bond had been posted, why excavation work on the site remained incomplete after about 2½ years, and alleged that the applicant had trespassed, that retaining walls were unfinished and that sediment from the site had entered a creek; she also said trucks had been parked on neighbors' property. David Grunwald asked how commitments to build a road and retaining walls related to permitting and plat approval.
Mathieu Perron, the applicant’s civil engineer from CMT Technical Services, said he and the project team had worked for about a year to comply with applicable codes and was present to answer technical questions. Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District Senior Planner Curtis Woodward summarized review‑agency findings and recommended conditions. Staff also corrected a code citation in the draft findings (condition 4 should reference 18.10.040 rather than 18.16.010) and recommended an additional condition (12.F) that septic drainage fields and slope‑protection waivers are not approved as part of the plat. The motion also includes a municipal tax‑clearance requirement before final plat recordation and notes that failure to record the plat within the ordinance period may render the plat voidable.
The commission additionally noted that a draft "Cross Access, Utilities Easement" uploaded April 21, 2023, must include legal descriptions and parcel numbers for all properties subject to the easement and recommended that the easement specify that future maintenance of the right‑of‑way is a shared responsibility of property owners.
The commission’s approval was procedural: it granted plat approval subject to the enumerated staff conditions and the added restrictions described above. The minutes record the approval but do not include a separate enforcement timeline or bond amount for outstanding work; the transcript and minutes indicate those matters remain to be addressed through the plat conditions, agency follow‑up and any subsequent permitting or enforcement actions.
