Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hampton Court Steps topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ZBA approves front‑steps variance for Hampton Court homeowners
Summary
The Ossining Zoning Board of Appeals approved an area variance to rebuild and slightly reconfigure a front staircase for homeowners at 8 Penkins Court, finding the proposed design reduces an existing nonconformity.
The Village of Ossining Zoning Board of Appeals voted June 9 to approve an area variance (ZBA 9‑2026) allowing a replacement front portico and stairs at a home on Penkins Court.
Architect Michael Bavino appeared for the homeowners and explained the proposed work would replace an existing nonconforming staircase, move retaining walls inside the property line and reduce the prior encroachment: "the front yard required setback is 30 feet, the existing staircase is at 3.8 [feet], and we're proposing 6.6," he told the board.
Board members considered the five factors used in variance review. Several members said the proposal reduced an existing nonconformity, improved safety and would not materially harm neighborhood character. Chair Aberizzic noted the proposed change was "a safer, more attractive update," and members referenced similar recent approvals where small reductions were allowed to retain neighborhood consistency.
On a roll‑call vote the board approved ZBA 9‑2026; staff advised it will take a few weeks to finalize signed paperwork so permits may follow. The applicant was advised of the need to submit documented plans for public posting and for subsequent Board of Architectural Review consideration if applicable.
The approval allows the homeowners to rebuild their staircase with the proposed materials and altered footprint as presented to the board, subject to the standard permitting and Building Department review processes.
Because the board framed the action as reducing a preexisting nonconformity, members emphasized that the specific plan details and retaining‑wall relocation were material to the decision and should be reflected in the final permit documents.
