Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves Wellsville Safe Storage rezoning after debate over gateway and property rights
Summary
After a contested public hearing in which neighbors warned rezoning would harm a view corridor and proponents cited property rights and aesthetic mitigations, Cache County Council voted to approve the Wellsville Safe Storage commercial rezoning (Ordinance 2026-30).
Cache County Council voted on Jan. 9 to approve Ordinance 2026-30, rezoning an 8-acre parcel near the American West Heritage Center to a commercial classification that will allow self-storage and other commercial uses.
Development Services staff described the parcel's history: the site is off a county road near US-89 in a corridor identified as scenic; the planning commission earlier recommended denial and the previous council vote had denied an industrial rezoning. "Planning commission recommended denial to the county council on a 5-to-2 vote," staff said.
At the public hearing, proponents including the property owner and developer emphasized property rights and mitigation measures. Developer Travis Baldwin said the project team had provided visuals (berms, trees, color choices) to soften the units and planned financial support for community organizations. Part-owner Margaret Bosworth told council that owners had not been approached by other buyers and stressed they should be allowed to pursue income from a smaller parcel they cannot farm.
Opponents and nearby residents urged preserving the view corridor and suggested conservation easements as an alternative. "This is part of the gateway into the valley," said a nearby resident who recommended protective easements; others warned that commercial units would appear out of character next to the American West Heritage Center.
Council members debated competing principles: members praised property rights and the planning process but also expressed concern for preserving vistas and the heritage center's setting. Several council members said they preferred open space but felt constrained by property-owner proposals and planning-and-zoning outcomes. A motion was made to suspend rules and approve the rezoning; the motion carried after members voted orally (several "I" votes and at least one recorded "nay").
Council discussion also covered infrastructure: the developer would be required to upgrade the access road at the developer's expense, and staff noted the parcel lacks direct frontage on US-89 and would use a local access road.
Ordinance 2026-30 was adopted on first reading after the suspension of the rules. The council did not specify a date for any required design or landscape conditions beyond the general discussion of mitigation and road improvements; staff will return with applicable conditions and permitting steps.
