Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves 90 Columbia Street site plan under MBTA community zoning with parking monitoring requirement
Summary
The planning board approved site plan review for 90 Columbia Street under the MBTA community zoning provisions, subject to conditions including reconstructed sidewalks, prohibition from joining the on‑street resident parking program, and a two‑year parking monitoring analysis.
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Quincy Planning Board approved site plan review for 90 Columbia Street (case 2022‑603) on June 10, 2026, under the MBTA Community zoning provisions. The approval carries a set of conditions focused on pedestrian improvements, parking management and construction controls.
Applicant representatives reported design updates since the prior meeting, including extension of the sidewalk along Plane Street, relocation of a transformer next to the dumpster, additional fencing to address wind near a playground, elimination of a left‑turn lane request, and a designated snow storage area. The project team confirmed the pool on site will be pumped off‑site rather than discharged to the stormwater system.
Mr. Stevens summarized the department’s recommendation under Title 17, section 8.6 (MBTA Community zoning), noting state timelines tied to the MBTA law and the city’s parking limits. Conditions include a required construction management plan, reconstruction of the sidewalk along the property frontage, prohibition on future residents of the development joining the city’s on‑street resident parking program, a two‑year post‑occupancy parking monitoring analysis with required follow‑up if projections are exceeded, a water flow test prior to a building permit, recorded stormwater O&M prior to occupancy, and standard noise, rodent and dust control plans. The board voted to approve the site plan with those conditions; the record also notes that a newly reappointed member, Moren Glenn, was not qualified to vote on this matter.

