Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Multiple Building Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SHPO explains when multi-building projects need separate tax-credit applications
Summary
SHPO presenters said functional relationship, historic use, ownership and Sanborn maps determine whether several buildings are one project or multiple; ownership reconfiguration to avoid review may cause separate applications.
During the webinar the SHPO clarified rules for projects that include multiple buildings, stressing that the National Park Service and state reviewers determine whether buildings are functionally related and should be treated as a single historic-tax-credit project. Fen, a tax credit reviewer, said applicants must demonstrate historic functional relationships (for federal projects, within the districtperiod of significance; for state-only projects, generally more than 50 years) or else submit separate Part 1 applications.
Ownership matters: reviewers look at current ownership and historical evidence; where buildings were not historically related or ownership is divided, separate applications are typically required. Presenters recommended using Sanborn maps and other historical resources to document relationships and contacting SHPO before documenting large complexes.
Cumulative effect: the office explained that reviewers assess the cumulative effect of all proposed work on a propertyrather than judging isolated work items — that overall approach can allow flexibility (unaltered portions of a site can offset work that might otherwise fail the standards) but also means widely distributed changes can affect the entire property's historic character.
What applicants should do: for large or diverse properties (military bases, corporate complexes, university campuses) request guidance from SHPO/NPS early; prepare site plans showing all buildings and ownership; document every building on the property unless directed otherwise by NPS guidance.
