Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears policy changes tied to legislation; heated debate over adding a fourth level to elementary report cards

Watertown School District 14-4 Board of Education · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees approved several policy updates driven by recent legislation (food service, medication, reporting child abuse); a contentious discussion followed on the IKA grading/report card format, with one board member urging a fourth 'exceeds' level and others cautioning it would require reworking standards.

At its June meeting the Watertown School District board advanced multiple policy updates driven by recently passed legislation and held a substantive debate over changes to the elementary standards‑based report card.

Administrators presented several first readings and second readings of policy changes that implement state laws: food‑service management language reflecting a new state bill about free lunch eligibility; a consolidated tobacco‑free district policy (AEA); a new policy authorizing assignment of students to alternative instructional settings for aggressive behavior (IGBI); and policies codifying medication administration, student self‑administration forms and updated mandatory‑reporter language that explicitly includes coaches.

On the grading policy (IKA), one board member urged the board to "give some serious consideration to adding [a] fourth level to recognize student excellence," arguing a top level (e.g., "exceeds") would reward motivation and high performance. The proponent cited examples from other South Dakota districts that use a four‑level standard (one through four) and suggested it would encourage lifelong learning habits.

Other board members and staff pushed back, noting the district’s current K‑4 standards are written as "I can" statements intended to be assessed as yes/no across quarters. An opposing member warned a fourth level would require rebuilding the standards and could introduce subjectivity into primary‑grade observations: "I think it also opens up a huge… can of worms… it’d be very subjective to the teacher to determine what it means when you’re exceeding." Staff explained the vertical columns on the standards report card represent quarterly reporting rather than a fourth achievement tier.

Board members were asked to gather more input from parents and staff before the second reading; the AEA policy (tobacco‑free consolidated language) was approved on second reading that night as part of the policy packet. Other second‑reading policies (IBH online education; IKE grading technical edits; IMG procedures for service animals and animals in school) were also approved.

The board scheduled policy approvals for the next meeting where appropriate; discussion on the grading scale will continue with staff feedback and public comment.