Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whitehall commissioners pull back sale inquiry after heated public outcry over Range Road, set Jefferson Park rec‑center process
Summary
After hours of public comment about warehouses, data centers and declining open space, the Whitehall Board of Commissioners withdrew plans to pursue an immediate sale of Range Road parcels and instead approved starting a public review of Jefferson Park as the preferred recreation‑center site, 4–3.
Whitehall Township commissioners on June 8 paused a proposed investigation into selling township-owned land on Range Road after sustained public opposition and long debate about possible warehouses and data centers.
The meeting drew dozens of residents to speak for and against Resolution 3444, which would have authorized a formal, preliminary review of the Range Road parcels (the “Cameron tract” and adjacent recreation fields) after a commercial real‑estate firm approached the township. Mayor/President Warren told the audience the resolution was intended to bring an outside inquiry into the open for public review rather than complete an immediate sale.
Why it mattered: speakers on both sides framed the choice as a tradeoff between short‑term revenue and long‑term community character. Proponents said a sale could provide funds for capital needs; opponents warned that publicizing a possible sale would put a value on open space, accelerate speculative interest and could leave the township with vacant warehouses or other industrial uses residents say are unwanted.
Resident Laurian Fenel urged the board to protect open space, saying: “I love Whitehall Township’s wildlife. You just can’t sell our souls for this.” Deborah Rosine, a member of the township’s environmental advisory community, told commissioners the township had existing open‑space protections and urged use of the open‑space committee and public‑private partnerships to restore and maintain fields rather than sell them.
The solicitor told the audience that CBRE (a national commercial real‑estate firm) had submitted inquiries to the township on behalf of a client; the board’s stated goal was to investigate possibilities and implications, including zoning and entitlements that affect value. “We didn’t seek this out; somebody proposed it to us,” the mayor said in response to residents who accused commissioners of moving in secret.
After several hours of testimony, public speakers and commissioners’ discussion, one commissioner asked to withdraw Resolution 3444 so the board could pause and reconsider next steps. The meeting record shows the item did not move forward to sale authorization that night.
At the same meeting the board voted 4–3 to adopt Resolution 3446 to confirm Jefferson Park as the location to pursue further study and public review for a proposed recreation center. Commissioner Ken (who led feasibility work) described multi‑year planning, cost estimates and earlier public outreach; opponents questioned timing, construction costs and whether the township can afford a center without major grants. “If we don’t build a recreation center, I’m done,” Commissioner Ken said, arguing that continued effort is required to capture grant opportunities. Other commissioners countered that rising construction costs and divided board support make the project premature.
What happens next: the Jefferson Park resolution directs staff to continue preliminary study and public outreach; any formal design, budget or construction plan would require further approvals and, in many cases, grant or other financing. The board’s action left the Range Road inquiry effectively paused for now while the township considers alternatives including preserving open space, pursuing public‑private partnerships and updating its comprehensive plan.
Who spoke: the public record includes dozens of residents who opposed selling open space (Laurian Fenel, Lori Jarvis, Deborah Rosine and others) and commissioners who argued both for and against further investigation (Commissioners Snider, Chrisman, Slaniker, Fox, Stakes, Tia and President Warren). The solicitor and mayor repeatedly emphasized the difference between investigation and an immediate sale.
Next steps: commissioners and staff said they will continue to refine the town’s land‑use options, pursue a comprehensive plan update that has been discussed for years, and consider ordinances (including draft data‑center regulations) before any final land‑use or sale decisions are made.
