Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline On Buses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beaufort County Schools tightens bus conduct rules, adds electronic referral and tracking
Summary
The district proposed revisions to Administrative Regulation SS 19 to strengthen bus safety, introduce an electronic bus‑referral form routed through area supervisors into the district discipline system, and limit who can view referrals. Staff pledged training and agreed to data updates to assess impact.
Dr. Derek Skaggs, introduced to the operations committee as the district’s director of student success, outlined proposed revisions to Administrative Regulation SS 19 governing student conduct on buses, saying the changes are intended to “strengthen student safety, streamline the discipline referral process, and ensure equitable enforcement.”
The update creates a BCSD bus contact form that drivers complete at the end of a route. Those electronic forms go to the area supervisor and are entered into the district’s behavior database (Educator’s Handbook) as a pending referral for the school administrator to review. Staff said the change is meant to reduce lost or delayed paper referrals and to give drivers faster feedback on outcomes.
Why it matters: district officials framed the changes as safety and equity improvements. They said a fight on a moving bus poses higher risk than the same incident at school and that consistent, districtwide handling will remove local inconsistencies that previously allowed repeat incidents to persist.
Board members and bus drivers pressed staff on confidentiality and access. Staff said bus drivers cannot see district-wide student discipline histories; only area supervisors and the director can view bus referral records to preserve privacy. Regarding evidence, Skaggs said video footage will be pulled immediately for serious or contested incidents or any case that proceeds to a hearing, because retrieving and processing footage is time consuming.
Drivers and driver advocates welcomed the changes. Pastor Isaac Gordon, who identified himself as a long‑time bus driver, said the system “sounds good” and praised the quicker feedback, adding that drivers often felt ignored under the former process. Skaggs acknowledged it has been only a few weeks since rollout and committed to producing outcome data: staff agreed to provide follow‑up reports (suggested 90/180/365‑day intervals) so the board can monitor infractions, consistency of consequences and driver morale.
What’s next: the AR updates are proposed for the board’s review; staff will continue training area supervisors and school administrators and return with data to evaluate whether the changes reduce incidents and improve driver retention.
