Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Fannin County commissioners over alleged animal neglect, court handling
Summary
At a lengthy public-comment period, residents including a 12-year-old described animals roaming and dying at a neighboring farm, accused law-enforcement and the magistrate of mishandling cases, and urged faster enforcement and a county ordinance; commissioners said authority is limited but promised to follow up and aim to have an ordinance drafted soon.
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a Fannin County Board of Commissioners meeting, multiple residents used the public-comment period to describe what they said were months of animal neglect and safety hazards at a nearby farm, and to criticize local law-enforcement and a magistrate’s handling of related court cases.
A 12-year-old who the meeting identified as Kristen said she cannot play in her backyard because dogs and livestock from a neighboring property enter her yard without collars or food, and that one of the animals recently charged at her dog. "All I see is those animals…without any food," she said, adding that the situation has left her family afraid to use their yard. County leaders told her they would check the property and its animals.
Other speakers expanded the allegations, describing dead animals, burn piles and dogs attacking people’s property. "We have animals that have died out there. We have animals that are being starved to death," one speaker said, and said she had state and federal licensure as a rescue operator and had documented the conditions. Several commenters said they possess body-camera footage and court records that, they said, show enforcement and court responses they considered inadequate.
Speakers criticized how a recent magistrate hearing was conducted. One resident who attended the hearing described being prevented from presenting evidence and said the magistrate made dismissive remarks, including telling a child that because she "didn't get hurt," the risk did not matter. Commenters said they intend to seek review by the Judicial Qualifications Commission and have spoken with local media and a law professor about the case.
Board members and staff responded that some enforcement functions—particularly criminal livestock enforcement—fall under the sheriff’s office, which the commission funds but does not directly control. "I don't have the jurisdiction to tell the sheriff what to do," a commissioner said. The board noted that animal-control staff have been sworn in and that the county is drafting an updated animal-control ordinance; one commissioner said they hoped to have the ordinance ready to post at the next meeting for public hearing processes in the coming weeks.
Animal-control staff at the meeting described visiting the property, seeing burn areas and animal remains in one location, and said they have issued citations in other cases. Speakers urged the board to give animal control authority and resources to act faster, and to pursue process changes so complaints do not stall.
The meeting record shows no formal action taken immediately on any single complaint; commissioners recorded a commitment to review evidence provided by residents, to coordinate with animal-control staff and law enforcement where appropriate, and to continue work on the draft ordinance.
The board adjourned after the public-comment period. The next procedural step the commissioners discussed was posting an ordinance draft for public review and scheduling a public hearing when the draft is complete.

