Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce And Supervision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board authorizes rulemaking to define 'direct supervision' and to cap supervisee counts for OTs and OTAs
Summary
The board approved initiating rulemaking to add a line‑of‑sight definition of "direct supervision" for level‑two fieldwork and faculty‑led fieldwork, to clarify documentation and to set supervision limits (including that OTAs may supervise no more than three individuals at a time from specified categories and that OTs may supervise up to three OTAs in addition to other categories). The board authorized staff to submit the package and to proceed if no adverse comments are received.
The California Board of Occupational Therapy voted to initiate rulemaking to amend two sections of the California Code of Regulations (sections 4180 and 4181) to clarify supervision standards and set numerical supervision limits.
Key elements in the proposed text include a definition of "direct supervision" for level‑two fieldwork and faculty‑led fieldwork as requiring a direct line of sight between the supervising occupational therapy practitioner and the student, with supervision tapering to less direct methods as appropriate for setting, client severity and student competency. The package also revises supervisory language to be consistent across subsections, clarifies that documentation should reflect the care the supervising OT provides, and standardizes phrasing (for example, using "on‑site" consistently).
Importantly, the draft adds caps on supervisees: occupational therapy assistants (OTAs) may supervise no more than three individuals at any one time drawn from listed categories (including aides performing client‑related tasks, limited permit holders and level‑two students), and OTAs may supervise up to 20 level‑one faculty‑led fieldwork students provided no more than three of those students are engaged in client‑related tasks. The text also clarifies that in addition to the groups in subsection G, occupational therapists (OTs) may supervise no more than three OTAs, ensuring OTAs do not count against the OT's cap for supervising licensed assistants.
The board considered practical examples and received public comment from education and association representatives, who generally supported clarifications. Kristen Neville (AOTA) and other commenters thanked the board for incorporating prior suggested edits. A motion to submit the proposed regulatory text to the director of the Department of Consumer Affairs and the Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency for review passed; if no adverse comments or hearings are requested during the public comment period, the board authorized the executive officer to complete the rulemaking and adopt the regulations with nonsubstantive edits as necessary.
"This clarification looks great," Kristen Neville said during public comment, thanking the board for incorporating prior concerns. The rulemaking was authorized and staff will proceed with required review and notice steps.
