Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Pcm 526 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan commission forwards Becknell Industrial rezoning to city council after neighbors press traffic, water and runoff concerns
Summary
The Seymour Plan Commission voted 8-0 to recommend rezoning a parcel at US 31 and US 50 from RS to I2 for a prospective Becknell Industrial development. Neighbors urged protections on traffic access, stormwater, lighting and water service; the developer agreed to two commitments.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Pcm 526 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Blair Carmino, a representative of Becknell Industrial, asked the Seymour Plan Commission on June 11 to rezone a property at the southeast corner of U.S. 31 and U.S. 50 from RS to I2, saying the company hopes to attract manufacturing or research-and-development tenants and that entitlements must be in place to meet fast tenant timelines. "My name's Blair Carmino with Becknell Industrial Offices," he said while outlining site utilities, rolling topography (about 20 feet of relief) and conceptual building layouts.
The petition, PCM-526, drew extensive public comment from residents along County Road 500 North who said the site’s proximity to the busy US 31/US 50 junction and the nearby National Wildlife Refuge raises concerns about traffic, stormwater discharge, night lighting and impacts to private wells. "It's going to create a nightmare at that intersection," resident Rick Zedric said, citing accidents and higher traffic volumes. Neighbor Larry Carpenter said area wells are shallow and costly to drill and asked whether the project would bring city water or sewer to 500 North; Carmino said Becknell would work with the water department but could not guarantee extension.
Why it matters: rezoning from residential to heavier industrial allows larger buildings and outside storage that can change traffic patterns, lighting and runoff in a primarily residential corridor. Residents argued the area is used for household life and wildlife habitat and urged the commission and city council to impose conditions if the rezoning proceeds.
Key technical points and developer commitments: Carmino described on-site stormwater management using ponds and engineered controls designed to meet the ordinance's quantity and quality requirements; he also said INDOT will require a traffic-impact study for any access onto state highways. In response to repeated resident requests, Carmino said Becknell would make two formal commitments "of record": that a data center would not be an allowable use on the property and that there would be no curb cuts (no ingress or egress) onto County Road 500 North. The plan commission chair and staff emphasized that final development plans and technical studies (traffic, drainage, grading) will be required and reviewed before any building permits are issued.
Opposition and technical questions: Neighbors pressed on how runoff will be routed and whether detention/retention ponds could overflow into Mutton Creek and the adjacent refuge; Commissioner Jerry Wells explained the stormwater ordinance requires sediment capture and devices (settling basins or mechanical swirl separators) to remove solids before discharge. Residents also sought guarantees on noise, illumination, and limits on night operations; Carmino said Becknell would design to meet or exceed local code, supply an illumination plan and increase screening along the south property line, but he could not yet answer details that depend on an eventual tenant.
Procedure and next steps: The Plan Commission voted to forward a favorable recommendation on PCM-526 to Seymour City Council. Staff said the petition's first city-council reading is scheduled for June 22 at 7 p.m., with a second reading on July 13 at 7 p.m., both to be held in the same room and streamed on the city's YouTube channel. Final conditions and technical requirements will be set during the development-plan review and by city council if it acts differently than the commission.
The vote: The commission recorded an 8-0 favorable recommendation to city council on the rezoning petition; no formal city-council action was taken at the meeting. The matter now proceeds to the council for public hearing and final decision.

