Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riverbank budget workshop flags a projected $2.7M structural deficit and a large sales‑tax reimbursement

City of Riverbank City Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a FY2026–27 budget that projects a nearly $2.7 million structural deficit and reserve drawdown to about 17.2%; council asked for more breakdowns on a $1.2M sales‑tax sharing payment to a developer and asked for further analysis of deferred staffing and wastewater maintenance.

Riverbank — Assistant City Manager Tamil Caner presented the City of Riverbank’s proposed FY2026–27 major‑fund budget at Tuesday’s council meeting and warned of a structural deficit and declining reserves if current spending and obligations continue.

Caner said the city projects $16 million in general‑fund revenues and $15.2 million in ongoing expenditures for the coming fiscal year, with one‑time projects and transfers leaving a projected ending reserve of approximately 17.15%. "When you take out those other obligated funds, the stabilization and the park project…we're projected to be at 17.15%," she told the council, warning that reserves are trending down from the year's starting point.

Council members pressed for further detail on several large items. Staff identified an estimated $1.2 million sales‑tax reimbursement this year tied to the Crossroads West commercial development; the underlying developer reimbursement agreement was explained as capped at roughly $3.8–3.9 million and paid from project area sales tax until the cap is reached. Caner said the budget shows the $1.2 million in the council transfer‑outs line but that the total obligation and timing are part of a multi‑year reimbursement schedule.

Councilmembers also asked staff to return with: a specific breakdown of the city council transfer‑out line (which includes the Crossroads West payment and other subsidies such as Sierra House), a clearer resident vs. non‑resident analysis of the bike/ebike calls for service tied to enforcement costs, and details on deferred capital and operating requests (including addition of a patrol deputy and a deputy city clerk). Several councilmembers expressed interest in restoring the deputy city clerk and adding a patrol deputy if fiscal analysis supports it.

On utilities and enterprise funds, staff noted the water fund is projected to run a deficit in the upcoming year and the sewer fund transfers include debt service and capital obligations; councilmembers urged inclusion of wastewater sludge removal as a funded item. Public commenters and one frequent budget speaker warned that without revenue increases or expenditure reductions, reserves could be exhausted within a few years.

Next steps: staff will return to council with the requested breakdowns, more detail on the Crossroads West sales‑tax sharing timeline, and updated staffing/capital options ahead of the June 23 budget adoption date.