Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustee urges clearer proclamation policy; board agrees to workshop
Summary
Trustee Daniel urged the Board of Trustees to adopt objective, content-neutral criteria for proclamations to avoid viewpoint discrimination and legal risk; Trustee Brent called for eliminating nonessential proclamations and the board agreed to consider revisions at a workshop.
Trustee Daniel on June 26 read a prepared statement urging the Mancos Board of Trustees to tighten the town's proclamation policy to avoid viewpoint discrimination and potential legal challenges. "If we're going to restrict speech with a policy then we must have a strong objective framework with clearly defined content-neutral criteria," Daniel said, citing the Supreme Court's concern about viewpoint discrimination in public forums.
Trustee Brent pushed a more direct remedy: "I hate proclamations. ... If it were up to me I would do away with all proclamations," he said, calling most proclamations antiquated and suggesting only those required for legal or grant obligations be retained (for example, the board's Arbor Day proclamation).
Other trustees struck a balance, noting the town needs objective criteria and an appeals or fallback process so the policy will not be applied inconsistently. A trustee noted the town had only voted on proclamations since February 2022 and earlier proclamations had sometimes appeared without clear origin. Another trustee suggested inviting outside counsel or a presenter from the Colorado Municipal League to a workshop; the transcript references "Sam Light" and CML legal guidance on First Amendment and municipal liability.
Rather than amend policy immediately, trustees agreed by consensus to take the proclamation policy to a workshop for deeper review and to prepare recommended objective criteria. The board did not take a formal vote to change or abolish proclamations at the meeting.
Trustees flagged legal risk sources discussed at the meeting, including potential claims under federal civil-rights statutes. One trustee referenced 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the context of litigation risk when a public body acts under color of law.
The board directed staff to schedule a workshop to study the proclamation policy and related legal guidance; a future agenda will carry any recommended policy changes back to a regular meeting for formal action.
