New council members call for charter review after contested mayor‑pro‑tem selection

Two councilors used opening remarks at the May 5 Durango City Council meeting to raise procedural and civility concerns tied to the April 21 selection of the mayor pro‑tem and broader questions about the city charter.

Councilor Koso opened with an extended statement accusing three colleagues of deviating from an established tradition for electing the mayor pro‑tem on April 21, saying the action “bypassed higher vote‑getters” and alleging the conduct contravened city charter section 2.203’s expectation that councilors refrain from personal attacks. “Anyone who watches the meeting recording starting at 12 minutes and 45 seconds will see three counselors deviate from tradition…,” Koso said.

Councilor Gonzalez, who said she is a newer council member, urged a review of the charter’s at‑large election system and selection process for mayor and mayor pro‑tem. Gonzalez suggested the council examine provisions including whether councilors should receive compensation and whether district‑based representation might better serve Durango residents.

At public comment, Jeff Hickox urged councilors to uphold stated governing values of teamwork, professionalism and respect and said the mayor pro‑tem selection undermined public trust. City staff and other council members did not reverse the April selection during the meeting; council majority actions on other agenda items proceeded.

What to expect: councilors signaled interest in a charter review and a retreat soon to address internal norms; any change to charter language would require a formal review and possible ballot action.