Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board approves variance allowing converted accessory building to encroach into side-yard setback

Zoning Board of Adjustments (City of Irving) · June 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Irving Zoning Board of Adjustments approved a variance for a converted accessory building at 505 Thompson Street, allowing it to encroach into the side‑yard setback. The board voted 4–1 after questioning the applicant about construction timing, permits and cost.

The Irving Zoning Board of Adjustments voted 4–1 to grant a variance that allows an accessory structure at 505 Thompson Street to encroach into the side‑yard setback.

Jocelyn Murphy, director of planning, told the board the case (2026‑1114) concerns a side‑yard setback for an accessory building that has been converted to storage. Murphy said the matter had been discussed at a prior work session and staff was available to answer questions.

The applicant, Fritzy Ramirez of Irving, told the board the structure was built around 2023 by a contractor the family has been unable to contact. Ramirez said the family paid in cash and that her mother estimated the construction cost at about $20,000. When asked whether they had obtained building permits, Ramirez said she had not been informed about permit requirements.

Board members asked about the placement of the structure and whether renovation or relocation was feasible. Ramirez said the structure was generally aligned with the main house and that moving or renovating it to meet the setback would be a major undertaking; she added the family would pay any fees the city assessed.

After discussion, a motion to approve the variance was made and seconded. The board recorded four votes in favor and one opposed, and the motion carried.

The approval allows the existing accessory structure to remain in its current location subject to any permit and inspection requirements the city enforces going forward. The board did not specify a timetable for any required permits or remediation.