Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Bradenton council actions, June 10, 2026
Summary
Council approved acceptance of the EDC’s visioning plan, two charter amendments for the November ballot, utility and public‑works contracts, and several project resolutions; key development amendment was rejected and a conditional impact‑fee arrangement was approved.
Key votes recorded at the June 10 Bradenton City Council meeting (all votes noted were voice/roll‑call and as recorded by the clerk):
- EDC Dover Coal (economic development visioning) plan: motion to accept plan approved 5–0 (SEG 391–416). - Consent agenda (items A–N): approved 5–0 (SEG 440–470). - Special use permit (Resolution 2641) for private dock at 12155 0th Street Court East: approved with stipulations, 5–0 (SEG 1095–1115). - Ordinance 4077 (charter amendment to remove mayor tiebreak vote / clarify mayor not a member of council): second reading and motion to place on Nov. 3, 2026 ballot approved 5–0 (SEG 1384–1392). - Ordinance 4078 (charter amendment to add term limits for mayor and council): second reading and motion to place on the Nov. 3 ballot approved 5–0 (SEG 1778–1787). - Resolution 2654 (Ironwood Condominium water main replacement assessment): motion approved 5–0 (SEG 2019–2029). - Sweet Sparkman Architects contract amendment for public‑works master plan (phase one design and construction administration): approved 5–0 (SEG 2784–2802). - Woodard & Curran agreements: wastewater facility plan (26‑031EJ) and drinking water facility plan (26‑030EJ) — both approved 5–0 (SEG 3219–3249). - MET 2 purchase‑and‑sale second amendment (impact‑fee language): motion rejecting the amendment carried 5–0 (SEG 5580–5594). - Conditional impact‑fee arrangement for MET 3/shuffleboard site: council approved a contingent city waiver of 30% of impact fees if CRA approves 70% coverage, 5–0 (SEG 5730–5740).
Council directed staff and counsel to prepare contract language reflecting the conditional arrangement and asked the CRA to consider the recommended contribution at its next meeting. The council also requested a future workshop to set a consistent impact‑fee policy.
