Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Use Variance Condo Conversion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ZBA approves use variance so longtime Depina family can convert two dwellings at 26 West Bliss Street into condos

Town of Dartmouth Zoning Board of Appeals · June 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Dartmouth Zoning Board approved a use variance to allow a condominium conversion of two legally existing detached dwellings at 26 West Bliss Street, finding the parcel’s long history and unique configuration meet the statutory four-part test.

The Dartmouth Zoning Board of Appeals voted June 11, 2026 to grant a use variance that will allow a condominium conversion of two pre-existing detached dwellings at 26 West Bliss Street.

Petitioner Joseph Depina told the board the property has been in his family since 1967 and that the conversion would split ownership but not change the appearance, use or density of the two dwellings on the site. He said the conversion would help keep the property in the family and allow his niece to purchase and update one of the units.

Why it matters: Condominiums are not an allowed use in the general residence district under Dartmouth zoning section 375-10.2, so the applicant required a use variance under section 375-43.3. The property measures 43,675 square feet, larger than the lot-area thresholds that govern two-family dwellings, and the board found the parcel’s history — including a second dwelling created by an earlier variance — created a unique circumstance that supported a variance.

Board findings and vote: After reviewing the four statutory variance prongs (unique circumstances related to soil/shape/topography, hardship, public good, and intent of the bylaw), and confirming there were no public speakers in opposition, the board closed the public hearing and approved the variance with the prepared findings and stated conditions. The vote was recorded as in favor.