Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cape Fear Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planners debate upzoning of 200 block of Cape Fear Boulevard; parking, uses and height draw scrutiny
Summary
Staff presented possible rezoning of the 200 block of Cape Fear Boulevard to a higher-density mixed-use or a new 'commercial transition' district. Commissioners asked for clearer vision and raised concerns about parking feasibility on typical 50-foot lots, allowable nightlife uses, height and buffers for adjacent residences.
Carolina Beach staff brought commissioners an initial review of rezoning options for the 200 block of Cape Fear Boulevard aimed at encouraging higher-density, mixed-use redevelopment with active ground floors and pedestrian-oriented streetscape.
Mr. Hardison summarized the land-use rationale: the town’s plan identifies the area for mixed-use commercial with potential four- to five-story buildings, active ground-floor uses and up to about 29 units per acre. Staff proposed dimensional changes (reduced front setbacks of 5–10 feet, increased lot coverage to ~60 percent) and noted the area lies in a flood zone so buildings would require flood-proofing measures and elevated mechanical systems.
Commissioners praised the intent to activate the corridor but repeatedly cautioned that the draft table of uses included bars, taverns and breweries, which some commissioners said are not appropriate at what serves as an entry to the central business district. Concerns focused on where required parking would be accommodated on the typical 50-foot lots in the area and on transition standards to protect existing single-family homes behind the block. One commissioner said the draft allowances for bars and event venues "make me uncomfortable" and suggested narrowing permitted uses.
Staff said previous outreach with the two existing businesses (a grocery store and a small hotel) showed conditional interest; property owners generally liked increased flexibility but worried about becoming nonconforming if rules changed. Jeremy and other staff advised that downzoning restrictions under recent state law require care and that any change would include public hearings and notices to adjacent owners. Commissioners asked staff to continue refining the proposal, develop clearer design guidance or a vision, and draft buffering/parking options and transition standards for a future public hearing.
Next steps: staff will continue to refine zoning alternatives, return with design/parking options and conduct outreach and public hearings in the coming months.
