Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Youth Social Media topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Educator urges District 196 to join social‑media lawsuit and to promote delaying smartphones for students

District 196 School Board · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Grant Eustace, an educator and parent, asked the board to consider a motion to join a national lawsuit alleging social media platforms design for compulsive use and to endorse a nonbinding district resolution recommending families delay providing smartphones to children until after eighth grade.

Grant Eustace, speaking during the board’s special communications period on June 8, asked District 196 to join more than 900 school districts in litigation against social‑media companies that he said design platforms to encourage compulsive use among youth.

“These companies intentionally design their platforms to promote compulsive use, especially among young people,” Eustace said, linking the district’s interest to classroom disruptions, increased anxiety and lost instructional time. He cited recent reporting and a Surgeon General report that he said supported a bell‑to‑bell ban and urged the board to bring a motion to join ongoing litigation.

Eustace also proposed a nonbinding resolution recommending that families delay providing smartphones until at least the end of eighth grade and offering supportive community‑education approaches such as device fairs and parent classes. He clarified the resolution would not be a mandate but would support families interested in delaying smartphone ownership.

Board members did not take immediate action during the meeting; Eustace said he and others have signatures and endorsements from staff and community members and asked the board to consider a vote.

Why it matters: The proposal ties to district concerns about student mental health, classroom disruptions and state policy discussions on youth and social media. The board has not publicly scheduled consideration of the suggested actions.