Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deerfield planning board presses for stricter pre-construction inspections, bond reviews after incomplete builds
Summary
The Planning Board voted extensions for two subdivisions but spent most of the June 10 meeting pressing staff to add clearer pre-construction, inspection and enforcement language to site-plan and subdivision regulations and to institute periodic bond reviews after past projects were left unfinished.
The Deerfield Planning Board on June 10 pressed staff to tighten pre-construction requirements, inspections and bond-review procedures after members recounted multiple cases in which developers began work without completing required inspections or finishing projects.
Board members said the town engineer should lead pre-construction conferences and recommended adding a planning-board representative, the road agent and the town planner to those meetings so all parties are aligned before the first shovel moves. "No construction shall happen without a pre-construction meeting," a board member said during the discussion.
Members also urged clear, enforceable consequences in the site-plan and subdivision regulations for failing to follow pre-construction and inspection requirements, including withholding certificates of occupancy, refusing road acceptance and using bond proceeds to complete unfinished work. The board discussed an example in which a previously posted $5,000 bond proved insufficient when a developer abandoned a project; members said periodic bond re-evaluation would help address inflation and phased projects.
The board reviewed existing subdivision language that requires the owner or contractor to "contact the town engineer" to schedule a pre-construction conference and agreed to draft amendments making the procedural chain of notifications explicit (town engineer contacts staff; staff notifies the board and interested officials) and to add a paragraph outlining consequences if required inspections are not completed.
Members also debated whether tree-cutting or other disturbance should be allowed prior to the pre-construction meeting. The board generally favored a "no disturbance" posture for site-plan and subdivision projects, and asked staff to insert explicit language in the revised regulations. Town engineer representation (referred to in the meeting as Kee or Keech Nordstrom) will be preserved as the technical lead for inspection and bond-estimate work.
Next steps: staff will draft proposed regulatory amendments, including language on pre-construction attendance, no-disturbance before the pre-conference, enforcement consequences and periodic bond review. The board plans to hold a public hearing on the proposed changes and seek recommendations from the town engineer before any adoption vote.
