Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Local Preference topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Santa Cruz adopts local-preference ordinance, directs mandatory selection guidelines and an annual review

Santa Cruz City Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council adopted a local‑preference ordinance for publicly subsidized affordable housing while directing staff to make resident‑selection plans mandatory in the implementing guidelines and return with a progress report during the annual housing‑element update.

The Santa Cruz City Council voted to adopt a local‑preference ordinance intended to steer publicly subsidized rental and for‑sale housing toward longtime residents and local workers, while directing staff to make the ordinance’s implementing guidelines mandatory and return with a progress report as part of the annual housing element update.

Advocates who testified during the council’s public hearing urged stronger enforcement and clearer documentation. Bruce Van Allen told the council he favored requiring owners to file “resident selection plans” and argued that the city should require owners to “provide annual documentation” supporting residents’ eligibility so that the city can measure whether subsidy dollars deliver local benefit. Several community members and nonprofit speakers said voluntary or inconsistent reporting would undermine accountability.

Mayor Fred Keely and council members negotiated language during the meeting to balance enforceability with legal constraints. Council members directed staff to include the language described in the public comments (the requirement for mandatory resident‑selection procedures) as part of the local‑preference guidelines that implement the ordinance, and they asked staff to return with progress reporting tied to the city’s annual housing‑element update so council can evaluate data collection and enforcement practices.

City staff and supporters emphasized that the ordinance’s implementing guidelines carry legal weight: the council’s direction makes the guidelines the primary mechanism for implementation and compliance. Community development director Lee Butler confirmed that tracking and data will be brought back with the housing element update and that staff is preparing systems for monitoring implementation.

The council’s action was taken after an extended public hearing and council deliberations. Following the vote the mayor stated the ordinance would be adopted as written with the additional direction on guidelines and the reporting schedule. The council recorded the motion and then called the roll; the motion passed and the ordinance proceeds to implementation under the mandated guidelines.

Next steps: staff will draft the formal local‑preference guidelines incorporating the mandatory resident‑selection plan language and an annual documentation requirement, and will return with an implementation report timed to the housing element update so the council can review the ordinance’s on‑the‑ground performance.