Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Space Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Houston committee weighs ordinance changes to let up to 30% of park dedication fees be spent citywide
Summary
Houston parks and planning staff recommended amending the open‑space ordinance to allow up to 30% of park dedication fees to be deployed citywide to address sector funding disparities; staff proposed a lower, simpler multifamily fee option and a schedule of hearings through June.
Chair Alcorn and city planners took up proposed updates to Houston's open‑space ordinance aimed at addressing a longstanding imbalance in how park dedication fees are collected and spent.
Kenneth Allen, director of the Houston Parks and Recreation Department, told the Budget & Fiscal Affairs Committee that since 2007 the city has collected "over $100,000,000" in park dedication funds across 21 park sectors and that 53.5% of total dedication revenue is generated by just five sectors. To reduce disparities, Allen recommended a change to Chapter 42 of the city's code to allow the department to deploy up to 30% of a sector's fees for citywide priority projects.
Planning Director Von Tran explained the legal context: Chapter 2 12 (state law) applies to multifamily development and may require complex appraisals, while Chapter 42 applies to both single‑ and multifamily development and currently collects fees at permit (the ordinance sets the fee at $700 per unit). Tran said staff recommends adopting the lower, simpler fee option for multifamily under Chapter 2 12, considering a fee‑only approach for multifamily developments and extending the current three‑year obligation window for using collected funds.
Committee members focused on implementation details. Chair Alcorn and others asked when fees are collected (at permit under Chapter 42) and whether a fee‑only approach would prevent developers from dedicating land; staff answered that land dedication could still count, but if the appraised value of dedicated land substantially exceeds the fee the city would be required under Chapter 2 12 to make up the difference. Von Tran gave a worked example: for a 100‑unit multifamily project, fees at $700 per unit equal $70,000, while a 1.8‑acre land dedication could be worth "upwards of $150,000," creating a potential delta the city would need to cover.
Builders and parks equity advocates both spoke during the public comment period. Mike Dischberger and Cody Miller of the Greater Houston Builders Association urged greater transparency about how dedication fees have been spent and warned that nominal fee increases can affect housing affordability. Taylor Valley Presley of the Coalition for Environment Equity and Resilience said the coalition supports the "70/30" approach because it would allow 30% of dedication revenues to be spent on citywide priority projects and urged that acquisition for park expansion remain a priority. Pastor Deb Benario Martin (Super Neighborhood 45) requested more outreach and questioned the criteria used to create the park sector map.
Staff provided a tentative schedule: produce a final redline by April 23, present to the Planning Commission on April 30, hold a public hearing on May 14 (with an option for a second hearing), return to this committee June 2, and then forward the ordinance to city council. No vote or fee increase was adopted at the committee meeting.
The committee asked staff to provide detailed historical reporting showing how park dedication funds have been received and spent by sector, and to engage business and community stakeholders as the ordinance moves through the hearing schedule.
