Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Athletics Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates removing cheerleading from athletics policy, seeks clearer off‑campus conduct and transportation language
Summary
The Quakertown policy committee considered PSBA updates that remove an explicit reference to cheerleading from athletics policy and debated whether student conduct rules and transportation language in policy 123 properly cover off‑campus activities and students driving themselves to events. Committee directed administrators to rewrite unclear language and return for review.
An education-policy committee meeting on June 13 moved to revise how cheerleading is referenced in district athletics policies and asked administrators to clarify when student conduct rules apply off campus.
A staff presenter told the committee that PSBA-recommended wording treats cheerleading as part of the broader athletic program and therefore removes a separate callout from policy 122/122.1. A committee member said she worried that removing an explicit mention could reopen past practices in which cheer squads received different treatment for equipment, budgets and pay. The administrator said recent pay-structure changes — separating competitive cheer pay from sideline cheer pay and adjustments made after discussions with athletic payroll staff — have addressed earlier inequities, and that the intent of removing the separate reference is to fold cheer into the overall athletics program rather than single it out.
Committee members pressed for assurances that prior disparities would not recur. One committee member said they had met with athletic staff about coach pay and that recent changes had already corrected some issues. Another member said the committee should keep “a wary eye” and asked that the change be finalized only after confirming equitable treatment across programs.
The committee also scrutinized policy 123’s language about transportation and off‑campus conduct. The draft restores a sentence noting the district will provide transportation to designated off‑campus interscholastic activities but makes clear that the service is optional and not required if no students request it. Administrators explained the operational process: coaches identify students who need transportation, enter requests into the district travel-tracker system, and transportation staff (Brook) arrange vehicles and routing.
A deeper dispute focused on language that would apply the student code of conduct to off‑campus incidents “during the time the student is traveling to and from school or school-sponsored activities.” Several committee members said the phrase could be overbroad, especially for students driving themselves in personal vehicles. Administrators replied that the intent is to address conduct by students who are representing the district or where off‑campus conduct materially and substantially disrupts school operations (for example, verified threats, organizing fights, or incidents that create safety and supervision burdens). They said enforcement would rely on verified evidence rather than rumors and suggested reworking student-facing text and cross-references to bullying policy.
The committee asked administrators to rewrite the off‑campus and travel-related language to be clearer about scope and enforcement and to return the revised text to the next meeting. Policies 122 and related athletics items will continue through the policy process once wording is clarified.
The committee ended the discussion without a formal vote on the specific wording and marked policy 123 for additional edits before approval.
