Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews short‑term rental survey and signals interest in clearer definitions and conditional‑use review
Summary
After reviewing a 147‑response survey, commissioners expressed support for clearer definitions (short‑term rental vs. bed‑and‑breakfast vs. motel), suggested using lodging‑tax records to estimate existing activity, and largely favored pursuing conditional‑use or permitting options in some residential districts rather than leaving STRs unregulated.
Planning staff presented results of a December survey of short‑term rental (STR) views and proposed four approaches for the county: (1) minimal zoning‑certificate registration; (2) moderate regulation requiring conditional‑use permits (CUPs) in residential zones with standards; (3) prohibitions or limitations in specific zoning districts; and (4) a do‑nothing approach.
Key survey findings presented to the commission: about 147 responses were received; roughly 86% were Albany County residents and 93% of respondents owned county property. Respondents from rural areas made up about 82% of answers. On whether STRs should be allowed, 49% of respondents were supportive or strongly supportive, 34% opposed and 17% neutral. A narrow majority (51%) supported regulation of STRs; 52% favored prohibitions or limitations in certain zoning districts.
Commissioners discussed concerns raised by neighbors in areas such as Centennial, including housing availability, nuisance impacts, and differences between owner‑occupied B&Bs and commercial short‑term rental operations advertised through online platforms. The commission noted a mismatch between county permit records (two conditional‑use permits found in the county system) and a Centennial list of around 28 short‑term rentals, and suggested staff obtain lodging‑tax records to better estimate current activity.
Several commissioners urged the planning department to draft clearer definitions that distinguish motels, bed‑and‑breakfasts and short‑term rentals and to present options that would allow the commission to require CUPs with reasonable conditions (for example, limits on parking, required trash collection, and a local contact) where the community impact is likely. No ordinance was adopted at the meeting; staff was directed to prepare draft language and follow up with the commission for additional direction.
Quotes: "Short‑term rental is not defined anywhere in our current zoning... we need to bring some definition to what those various things are," one commissioner said. Another added: "If we set the rules, people who follow the rules will follow them, and then you're always going to have people who will refuse to follow them and they'll be subject to enforcement."
