Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delhi board approves temporary moratorium on solar development after 3–2 votes
Summary
The Village of Delhi board approved a temporary moratorium on the development and construction of solar energy systems after debate over grandfathering and whether the rule would affect residential ground-mounted systems; board members said zoning and comprehensive-plan updates will follow to clarify scope.
Get email alerts on the Solar Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Village of Delhi board voted to impose a temporary moratorium on the development and construction of solar energy systems, approving related measures by 3–2 votes after members debated the scope of the draft law.
The board first approved a resolution to file Local Law No. 2 of 2026 (Resolution 9 of 2026) by roll call; later the board debated the text of Local Law No. 2 itself. During discussion, members questioned whether the draft covered residential ground-mounted systems that are not attached to a building, and whether the draft included a grandfathering provision for existing systems. One member said they could not find a grandfather clause in the solar text even though it appeared in a related battery-storage moratorium; other members said they believed such protections were intended and could be clarified in follow-up zoning language.
Board members emphasized that the intent of the moratorium was primarily to address commercial-scale projects and not to prohibit homeowners from installing rooftop systems or small residential setups. Several speakers urged staff to draft clearer definitions distinguishing roof-mounted, building-integrated, and accessory ground-mounted residential systems, and to incorporate scale-based thresholds. The board indicated it plans to incorporate the moratorium into parallel zoning and comprehensive-plan updates so that long-term rules will replace the temporary measure.
The moratorium passed on a 3–2 vote. The transcript records a roll-call vote on the earlier filing resolution with Maya, Christina and Josh recorded as voting yes and Dan and Simon recorded as voting no; a later roll call on the Local Law similarly recorded three yeses and two nos. Members said the village can revoke the moratorium once zoning and planning work is complete.

