Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Roads Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sleepy Hollow committee outlines $17.4 million estimate to resurface 22 miles of roads, discusses prioritization

Sleepy Hollow Finance Committee · June 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members reviewed a high-level estimate that resurfacing 22 miles of Sleepy Hollow roads at $150 per foot would cost about $17.4 million and discussed funding trade-offs, coordination with water-infrastructure work, and the need for a prioritized project list.

The Sleepy Hollow Finance Committee on June 11 received presentations on village road conditions and a high-level funding estimate for full resurfacing.

Staff told the committee resurfacing 22 miles of village roads at an estimated $150 per foot would total roughly $17,424,000. Members stressed that cul-de-sacs and streets with extensive base failures are significantly more expensive per mile, and committee discussion focused on how to prioritize main thoroughfares and high-need segments within limited Motor Fuel Tax (MFT) and five-year capital funds.

Committee members also discussed the importance of coordinating resurfacing with the village’s water-infrastructure plan and drainage-pipe replacement; several members said tearing up newly resurfaced streets to replace substructure or failed drainage would be wasteful. Staff recommended maintaining a running spreadsheet of past resurfacing projects, dates, and costs to inform future prioritization and budgeting.

For the near term, staff said crack sealing material has budget approval and will be ordered for summer use to protect recently resurfaced sections (with fall sealing planned before freeze). Committee members noted fleet and staffing limits may affect timing and recommended an assessment-drivearound with road leads to create a prioritized list.

The committee did not authorize a specific capital project or appropriation at this meeting; members requested further cost breakdowns, an updated five-year capital spreadsheet, and coordination with the water-infrastructure schedule.