Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TIP district board weighs contribution to left‑turn restriction tied to Saranova development
Summary
Board members discussed a city‑required left‑turn restriction at the Woodall–Northway intersection prompted by the Saranova development and agreed to ask the developer for a cost estimate before considering any capped contribution; no funding decision was made.
The Angola TIP district board discussed an unanticipated traffic mitigation requirement on June 10 after a developer’s traffic study called for restricting left turns at the Woodall–Northway intersection near the Meyer gas station.
Staff said the change — effectively converting the Woodall approach to right‑in/right‑out only — is required by the city to meet the findings of the Saranova traffic study and was imposed through an ordinance; staff said businesses along Woodall had not been contacted directly about the change. Amanda, a city staff member, told the board the restriction is driven by the developer’s traffic study and that employees are likely to be the group most affected.
The board debated whether the TIP district should offer financial help for the median or design work. Members suggested several limited approaches: ask the developer for a ballpark cost and then decide whether to contribute a fixed amount; offer to cover design or specific line items rather than construction; or decline to approach the developer proactively to avoid creating an expectation of public funding. One board member cautioned against calling the developer directly because that could prompt an open request for money.
Cost signals in an email from staff and previous messages were mixed: the transcript records a line describing an “average price of center curb type A” and several participants said traffic control and design work will drive much of the cost. Estimates in the discussion ranged from small contributions (participants floated $10,000 to $50,000) to the observation that the full project could be "six figures, not seven," though no final cost was presented.
Board members agreed on a next step: ask the developer for a clear cost estimate and return to the TIP district board before making any commitment. The discussion did not produce a vote to fund the work.
The matter stems from the Saranova development’s required traffic mitigations; the ordinance that imposed the turning restrictions was referenced in the meeting but no ordinance number was given. The board did not authorize expenditures at this meeting and directed staff to gather cost details for a future decision.
