Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement And Payments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves payments and credits, tables hardware changes; Geoquest invoice paid

Bloomfield Library Building Committee · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved Application for Payment #34 ($78,826.84), accepted a $9,965.24 credit (PCO 185) and approved a Geoquest invoice for $1,541.12. A PCO for door and hardware modifications was tabled pending design-team review.

The Bloomfield Library Building Committee approved several routine financial items and tabled a hardware change order that members said requires further design-team clarification.

Finance and requisitions: The committee approved Application for Payment No. 34 in the amount of $78,826.84 after questions about contingency and retainage balances. Members noted approximately $340,000 remains on the project and significant retainage is still held on the mechanical contract.

PCOs and credits: The committee approved PCO 185, which reconciled Custom Electric’s utility allowance and returned a credit of $9,965.24 to the project. Committee members welcomed the credit.

Purchasing: The committee approved a previously outstanding Geoquest invoice (invoice 10969) for $1,541.12, which matched the remaining purchase-order balance; the vendor said the original bill was sent but not followed up.

Doors and hardware: Committee members reviewed a PCO for door and hardware modifications to address building-official requirements, locksmith programming and electrified hinge issues. Members expressed concern about potential duplicate charges (paying twice for hinge installation) and asked for design-team input on responsibility. The committee voted to table the hardware PCO pending further documentation and a response from the design team.

All approvals were by voice vote; the meeting minutes record motions passing with no recorded nays or abstentions on these items.