Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RSU 60 board certifies June 9 budget and bond results, issues assessment warrants for FY27
Summary
The RSU 60/MSAD 60 board certified the June 9 district budget-validation referendum and a separate SRRF bond question, approved assessment warrants for FY27, and authorized sending certified vote tallies to municipal clerks; the clerk read town-by-town vote totals during the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The RSU 60/MSAD 60 Board of Directors on a unanimous voice vote certified the results of the district's June 9 referendum on the district budget and a separate SRRF bond question and approved assessment warrants and installment schedules for fiscal year July 1, 2026–June 30, 2027.
During the meeting the clerk/treasurer read the formal computation and declaration of votes for the budget-validation referendum, giving town-by-town tallies and reporting the district totals as read aloud. The clerk stated the total affirmative votes and the total negative votes for the budget question and noted those computations would be entered into the district record and certified copies would be sent to each municipal clerk. The board then moved, seconded and voted to approve the certification and the record entry.
The clerk also read the results of the SRRF (minor capital projects bond) question held June 9, listing town-by-town tallies and district totals. The board approved entering that computation into the record and sending certified copies to municipal clerks as well. Board members also approved allowing remotely participating directors to sign certification documents later or to sign counterpart copies electronically, consistent with the board's remote‑attendance policy.
Later in the meeting the board moved and passed a separate motion to approve the warrant for assessment of tax, the assessment schedules and the notice of installments prepared by the treasurer. Officials explained those are the formal documents that notify each member town of the amount and timing of payments to the district for the coming fiscal year.
The board did not debate the substance of the vote totals during the meeting; the clerk's readings provided the numerical record that the board certified. The board directed that certified copies of the computations be sent to municipal clerks in the participating towns.
What happens next: certified copies of the vote computations will be distributed to municipal clerks and the district will proceed with the administrative steps laid out in the motions, including preparing the assessment warrants for town delivery.

