Motion to leave executive session approved; participants say no action was taken

Participants at a local meeting voted to end an executive session after a motion was moved and seconded; a subsequent roll call recorded five 'yes' responses. After the vote, attendees said no formal action had been taken during the closed session and that a separate motion would be needed to record that fact.

The Chair opened the exchange by calling for a motion: "Okay. Um, first we need a motion to come out of executive session," and a member moved, followed by another member saying "second." The motion’s wording was discussed briefly — one speaker restated the language as "the only things discussed close to close," and others confirmed that this reflected the intended motion language.

A roll call-style sequence followed: the transcript records the names Cordova, Carlson and Roast being called, each followed by a verbal "Yes." Two additional affirmative responses were recorded without names, for a total of five yes votes in the exchange as transcribed. The transcript does not identify who moved the motion by name; one speaker replied "I did" when asked who made the motion, but that speaker’s name is not given.

Following the vote, a participant stated, "and there was no action taken. We need to make another motion for that," indicating the group intended to make a separate formal motion to state on the record that the closed session produced no formal action. The transcript ends shortly afterward with the line "we are journed," an apparent transcription error; the record does not specify whether the meeting was formally adjourned, nor does it specify the governing body or the meeting date.

The transcript provides only this brief procedural exchange; it does not include the subject matter discussed in the executive session or any substantive decisions arising from it.