Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cherokee County gives Marshals limited probation authority for alcohol and tobacco retailers; resident raises due‑process questions
Summary
The board amended county code to let the Cherokee Marshals Office place alcoholic‑beverage and tobacco/vape licensees on probationary status for up to two months following certain violations, with written notice and appeal rights; public commenter Thomas Weaver warned of potential process conflicts with existing ordinance provisions.
Cherokee County commissioners on Nov. 18 approved parallel amendments to the county code that allow the Cherokee Marshals Office to place certain licensees on a probationary status for up to two months after a violation.
County staff said the alcohol ordinance amendment (new Section 6-23) targets offenses involving minors and establishes written notice, an administrative review and an appeal process; it is intended to provide a documented, intermediate enforcement step so a licensee can be monitored and re‑checked rather than immediately face suspension or revocation. Staff said existing Chapter 6 (Section 6-4 and related provisions) remains the county's process for suspension and revocation and that the new section creates a structured probation option with follow‑up reporting to the board if additional violations occur.
A similar amendment to the code governing tobacco, electronic cigarette and smoking‑related retailers extends the same probationary framework to those vendors, reflecting concerns about vape products and underage access. Staff said the change allows the Marshals Office to place a vendor on a two‑month probationary status, provide written notice of the grounds and conditions, then return to the board with recommendations if violations continue.
Thomas Weaver, a frequent public commenter, urged the commissioners to revisit the interaction between the new provisions and existing ordinance sections, citing due‑process concerns and the potential for parallel administrative tracks. Staff and commissioners said the new language is narrowly focused, retains appeal rights and is designed to offer a remediation path before pursuing license suspension or revocation.
Commissioner Ragsdale moved to approve the alcoholic‑beverages amendments; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Carter and passed unanimously. The tobacco/vape amendment followed a similar motion and vote later in the meeting.
