Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses SLV 40B proposal; members plan sitewalk and environmental review ahead of July presentation
Summary
Commissioners discussed a large proposed SLV 40B development (about 285 units) that could add more than 500 residents to town services, noted the developer does not plan to place remainder land in conservation, and agreed to a sitewalk and preparatory review before the developer’s appearance at a future meeting.
Commissioners devoted a substantive portion of their June 9 meeting to early-stage review and planning for an SLV-proposed 40B housing project that would construct roughly 285 housing units on multiple parcels, a scale the commission called large relative to Manchester-by-the-Sea’s existing housing stock.
Commissioners and staff described the sequence of outreach: SLV made an initial presentation to the select board and intends to present to other town boards and the Conservation Commission in July. Staff reported that SLV told the select board it does not plan to place remaining undeveloped land into conservation; commissioners noted the developer has signaled limited community concessions such as funding an additional playing field and seeking sewer extensions under Route 128.
"At this point they're saying they are not doing that because they are only purchasing the land in which they're going to develop," one commissioner said summarizing the developer's position. Commissioners flagged multiple potential impacts: increased sewer demand, additional students for schools, greater emergency-services needs, traffic and parking pressures, and potential impacts to wetlands and Graly Pond watershed (a primary drinking-water source). The commission emphasized the need to review flagged wetland areas on the site and to organize a commission-led sitewalk before the developer's presentation to prepare focused conservation questions.
The commission agreed to schedule an internal site visit after the Fourth of July to identify conservation-related priorities and potential concerns (wetland delineation, primary groundwater protection areas, coastal/wetland buffers and likely access/trenching for infrastructure). Staff noted SLV had previously flagged some wetland delineation flags on the property and that the commission should prepare specific questions for review when the developer presents.
Next steps: commission members will conduct a group sitewalk, coordinate a July agenda item for SLV’s informational presentation, and ask SLV to consider a voluntary site visit for commission members ahead of the formal hearing. Commissioners acknowledged a possible recusal by a member with property interests near the project and will check ethics guidance and select board appointment timing to ensure a quorum for future hearings.
