Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Paving Bids topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Adams Township accepts low summer paving and seal-coating bids as residents press for pothole repairs

Adams Township Board of Supervisors · May 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board accepted low bids from Shields Paving and Russell Standard for summer paving and seal coating, each subject to the Township Engineer's review, after residents urged action on potholes and asked about contract surcharges and accountability.

The Adams Township Board of Supervisors on May 11 accepted the lowest bids for this summer’s paving and seal-coating work while residents urged quicker attention to local potholes.

On motions carried unanimously, the board accepted the lowest paving bid from Shields Paving and the lowest seal-coating bid from Russell Standard; both awards were explicitly conditioned on review by Township Engineer Richard W. Craft. The motions were moved and seconded on the floor and recorded as passing with all supervisors in favor.

Several residents who spoke during the public-comment period pushed the board to repair local roads first. Deanna Khemani of 99 Snowcap Drive asked the board to inspect Snowcap and Alpine drives and said, “there are a lot of potholes” and requested that they be filled in. Gray Weller of 109 Snowcap Drive reiterated concern about Snowcap Drive. Tim Stack of 240 Forsythe Road asked whether the paving bids included surcharges; Khemani also asked whether there was accountability in paving contracts.

Township Engineer Richard W. Craft responded to those concerns, saying the township’s contract documents include “an 18 month maintenance bond,” which he presented as a post-construction accountability mechanism.

The board’s acceptance of both low bids was recorded as contingent on the engineer’s final review of the bid documents and qualifications; the board did not vote in the meeting text to authorize contract execution pending that review.

Next steps: the engineer’s review will precede any final contract award or notice to proceed. Residents who raised roadway concerns requested inspection and repairs for Snowcap Drive and the end of Clubside Drive; the board did not set a specific timeline for those repairs during the meeting.