Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Colts Neck committee approves preliminary investigation of Route 34 corridor
Summary
The Township Committee voted unanimously to request a preliminary investigation of properties along the Route 34 corridor to determine if areas should be designated for rehabilitation or redevelopment without condemnation; special planner Scott Taylor outlined a voluntary, multi‑step process and estimated initial studies could take months.
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Colts Neck Township Committee voted on May 27 to request a preliminary investigation of properties along the Route 34 corridor to determine whether parts of the corridor should be designated as areas in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment without condemnation. The action authorizes staff and the planning board to begin designation studies and stakeholder outreach.
Scott Taylor, vice president of Taylor Design Group, told the committee the process being recommended is redevelopment without condemnation, meaning any property participation would be voluntary. He described a multi‑step process that includes designation studies, planning‑board review for master‑plan consistency, public visioning and at least two public hearings before any ordinance adoption. Taylor estimated the designation studies could take a “couple of months” and that visioning and subsequent planning work may take roughly three to six months, though timelines are not fixed.
Committee members said they supported outreach to business owners and residents along the corridor and urged coordination with the redevelopment subcommittee. Mayor Viola said the study area posted in the meeting packet runs from Route 18 to the Flock intersection and does not extend north to Conover Road. Officials reiterated that designation would provide the township more control over design standards, streetscape and permitted uses along the corridor.
During public comment, residents asked whether the investigation is tied to Mount Laurel affordable‑housing obligations, whether existing housing (for example on Creamery Road) would be counted toward rehabilitation, how much acreage is included, and what the initial cost will be. Taylor and township officials repeated that the investigation phase is only a study to determine statutory criteria and that the redevelopment process would evaluate a range of land‑use options. Taylor said professional fees are billed hourly and that the township will provide an estimate for the investigation phase and a rate schedule to help clarify costs.
The committee moved and adopted the resolution requesting the preliminary investigation by roll call vote; the transcript shows the motion carried unanimously. Next steps include planning‑board review, public outreach and posting of materials on the township website for stakeholder review.

