Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Career Exploration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Litchfield outlines K–8 career exploration plan and middle‑school course; board presses on access and scheduling

Litchfield Elementary District governing board · June 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented a K–8 career exploration program and proposed middle-school courses (minimum 9 weeks in sixth and seventh grades) to start in 2026–27; board members pressed on whether the course will be required, how students in year‑long electives (band) will access it, and alignment with feeder high‑school pathways.

District staff presented an expanded K–8 career exploration initiative and a proposed middle‑school course sequence at the Litchfield Elementary District governing board meeting on June 10.

The presenter described the effort as organized around three pillars — inspiration, connection and readiness — and said the program was built from two years of planning and community feedback. "This is not going to be a nice to do. It's a need to do," the presenter said, summarizing student feedback gathered at regional summits that middle‑school exposure to careers is often missing.

Staff proposed a minimum structure of two nine‑week courses (one in sixth grade and one in seventh) delivered as semester‑length special‑area offerings tied to state K–8 career literacy standards. The first course will include an ECAP "light" (a simplified career and education plan) so students begin building records they can transfer into high school; staff said the district will push to ensure "course one" is accessible to as many students as possible within scheduling constraints. Curriculum resources identified include JA Inspire, the Center for the Future of Arizona's Possible Futures materials, and other free vendor resources that include professional development.

Board members asked for clarification on the timeline, entry conditions and how the course would interact with year‑long electives. Miss Moran asked whether the slide deck implied the program had already started; staff clarified Year 1 refers to the upcoming 2026–27 school year. When members raised concerns that students enrolled in full‑year electives such as band could be excluded, staff responded that scheduling realities mean "not all kids will be able to get it" in some schools but that the district will explore options (e.g., guaranteeing course one within a three‑year window and offering course two as optional).

Members also asked about alignment with Agua Fria (a common feeder district). Staff said Agua Fria's academy director participated in the course design committee and that the intent is to complement high‑school pathways rather than replicate them. Staff noted Litchfield had been invited to join a Future Me pilot to measure program effectiveness and said a summer PD and curriculum development week was planned to finalize course one and the scope-and-sequence.

Board members raised equity concerns: not all campuses have the same community partners for events. Staff said campuses were given sample events and a shared document to replicate successful activities and that the district intends to support principals and media‑specialist staff who will often deliver the course.

The presentation closed with a commitment to return to the board with finalized curriculum materials and PD plans; no formal action was taken on the item during the meeting.