Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Lands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects bill to expand corner-crossing access after hours of debate over survey markers and access
Summary
House Bill 19, a measure to codify corner-crossing access to federal and state public land, failed after senators debated a standing-committee amendment requiring an established legal survey monument and broader public-access concerns; proponents said clarification was needed, opponents warned the amendment would restrict access and be impractical for large areas lacking monuments.
The Senate committee of the whole considered House Bill 19, a proposal to clarify whether and how people may travel by foot from one authorized parcel of public land to another at section corners ("corner crossing").
Sponsor Senator Landon introduced the bill as an effort to "codify" the 10th Circuit decision that permitted corner crossing so long as private property is not physically touched. He said the intent was to provide clarity for hunters and recreationists who encounter enclosed private land across the state's checkerboard of public holdings.
A standing committee amendment proposed by Senator Boner would limit legal corner crossings to points that have an "established legal survey monument," such as a USGS or BLM brass or aluminum cap. Supporters argued the amendment hewed closely to the factual record in the 10th Circuit case and would give law enforcement a precise finite point for enforcement.
Opponents, including several senators from rural counties, said many section corners do not have visible monuments, or monuments have been lost over time, and that requiring a cap would effectively bar the public from accessing large tracts of public land. Senator Cole and others said handheld GPS devices are not legally precise enough for boundaries and that requiring a monument could be impractical and costly to reestablish across the state.
On a standing vote the committee amendment failed and the bill ultimately did not secure passage. After a required roll-call pursuant to Senate rules, House Bill 19 was deemed indefinitely postponed. Debate underscored tensions between landowner rights, practical surveying realities in remote regions, and public-access advocates who said the court ruling already recognized corner crossing absent physical trespass.
Senators on both sides recommended further work in the interim to try to craft a more durable solution acceptable to recreationists, landowners and law enforcement.
