Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum And District Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District adopts Lab‑Aids science pilot; end‑of‑year reports note progress and a limited ESY schedule exposure under review
Summary
The committee approved purchasing Lab‑Aids science materials for grades 6–8 (three‑year rollout starting with sixth grade); leaders also presented results from curriculum reviews, retention and student‑wellness surveys, NEASC findings on curricular mapping and MTSS, and said a limited ESY schedule link exposure is under investigation.
The district presented the conclusion of a multi-year science curriculum review and recommended Lab‑Aids (kits from Lawrence Hall of Science) for grades 6–8. The materials were described by the curriculum review team as activity‑based, phenomenon‑first, engineered to align with DESE performance‑based standards, and rich in supports for multilingual learners and students needing differentiation. Implementation will begin with sixth grade next year and roll into seventh and eighth in subsequent years. The presenter said capital funds already budgeted for curriculum materials will cover the initial purchase; the recommendation cited a $130,000 allocation out of an already-assigned capital request.
District leaders also presented year‑end strategic-plan highlights across communications, social‑emotional learning, data governance and curriculum reviews. The superintendent’s team reported a rebound in staff retention (district reported a 92.2% retention rate last year), progress on chronic‑absenteeism initiatives, new professional‑learning plans tied to the schedule change, and several grant‑funded pathway expansions at the high school.
Reviewers from NEASC (accreditation) visited the high school and issued findings that commended the school’s relationships and vision-of-the-graduate work, while identifying priority needs: completed stage‑1/UBD curriculum maps, a fully implemented data‑driven MTSS (tiered interventions), and facility limitations that relate to the MSBA process. Administrators said they will use summer and early‑fall professional time to continue curriculum mapping and to build progress‑monitoring capacity.
Separately, district staff reported a limited data exposure involving a summer ESY scheduling link that was distributed to some parents and later disabled. Officials said the exposed fields were limited to student names, a school/grade indicator and a schedule; they stated that disability diagnoses were not included and that they had disabled the link and were investigating processes and training to prevent recurrence. The district invited CPAC and DESE to review record-keeping and said additional safeguards will be implemented.
Committee members asked for updates on Lab‑Aids implementation, mid‑year pilot reports for sixth grade, NEASC follow-up work and written summaries of the data‑exposure investigation.
