Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Scott City council renews 911 dispatch agreement, securing roughly $486,000 in county reimbursement

Scott City Council · February 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Scott City Council authorized the mayor to execute a renewed agreement with the Scott County 911 Emergency Service Board, which City Administrator Dustin Whitworth said reimburses about $486,000 (half the dispatch budget) from the 911 tax. The motion passed unanimously among present members.

The Scott City Council on Feb. 2 authorized Mayor Rick Brashear to sign a renewed agreement with the Scott County 911 Emergency Service Board to continue Scott City’s role as a public safety answering point.

City Administrator Dustin Whitworth told the council the Scott County 911 Emergency Board reimburses the city for roughly half of the dispatch budget, which he estimated at approximately $486,000 funded by the county 911 tax. Council Member Victor Phillips moved to authorize the mayor to execute the agreement; Council Member Randy Morse seconded the motion.

The council approved the measure on a roll-call vote with the seven members present voting in favor: Mike Rhymer, Gary Miller, Victor Phillips, Heather Ingvalson, Jack Howard, Brian Pender and Randy Morse. The minutes noted the council seat was vacant for one position; there were no votes opposed or recorded abstentions.

Why it matters: the reimbursement covers a substantial portion of Scott City’s dispatch costs and maintains the city’s connection to county-level emergency call taking and dispatch services. City officials framed the renewal as continuity for public safety operations.

What happens next: the ordinance was advanced by motions for first and second reading and authorized for signature; no additional conditions or amendments were recorded during the meeting.

Provenance: topic introduced in council’s New Business list and discussed by City Administrator (SEG 001–SEG 002); roll-call adoption recorded in meeting minutes (SEG 002).