Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Norwich trustees unanimously authorize letter opposing proposed 73‑MW fuel cell for Amazon data center

Norwich Township Board of Trustees · December 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Norwich Township trustees on Nov. 11 unanimously authorized Township Administrator Jamie Fisher to send a letter objecting to a proposed 73‑megawatt natural‑gas fuel cell to provide supplemental power for an Amazon data center on Scioto Darby Road in Hilliard. The fire chief had raised the department's concerns.

Norwich Township Board of Trustees on Nov. 11 authorized Township Administrator Jamie Fisher to write and send a letter stating opposition and concerns about a proposed 73‑megawatt natural‑gas fuel cell system intended to provide supplemental power for the Amazon data center on Scioto Darby Road in Hilliard, Ohio.

Fire Chief Dave Baird presented the Fire Department's position and raised concerns about the proposal; the minutes record that trustees discussed those concerns before voting. The motion to authorize the letter (motion #251111.01) was made by Rick Tidd and seconded by Sonny Cantrell and passed unanimously (Cantrell—Yes; Tidd—Yes; Young—Yes).

The motion and supporting discussion in the minutes do not list the specific safety or environmental language that will appear in the letter, only that the board and the Fire Department oppose the proposed fuel cell system. The minutes describe the system as a 73‑megawatt natural‑gas fuel cell to provide supplemental power for the Amazon facility; no permit filings, vendors, or responding parties are recorded in the minutes.

What happens next: the minutes record that Mrs. Jamie Fisher was authorized to write and send the letter on behalf of the trustees. The record does not state the intended recipient, timeline for sending the letter, or any planned follow‑up action by the board.

Trustees' next procedural steps were not specified in the minutes; no vote on permitting, zoning or ordinance changes appears in the record.