Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Waynesfield council authorizes certified-mail notices for three nuisance properties; discusses abatement options
Summary
Council authorized certified notices with appeal rights for properties at 205 West Malberry, 209 East Malberry and 200 Northwest M Street and discussed abatement, posting procedures and limits on county funding for demolition.
Waynesfield council on Monday voted to send certified-mail violation notices with appeal rights to three properties flagged in the village's code-enforcement process and discussed next steps if property owners do not comply.
Code enforcement staff presented photos and evidence for 205 West Malberry (Todd Rains), showing overgrown grass, trash, a broken-down golf cart, trailer and a dilapidated shed. Council approved a motion to send a certified letter that would give the owner seven days to appeal; if no appeal is filed and violations persist, the village may pursue abatement.
Council also voted to send a certified notice to 209 East Malberry (Samantha Danner). Staff said the property showed partial cleanup but still had remaining violations; the certified-mail step was described as the next procedural stage before potential abatement.
The third property, listed in meeting materials as 200 Northwest M Street and associated in discussion with a Standing Clear name, has been in a multi-year enforcement process. The village solicitor, Daniel, told council that if certified mail is rejected, posting the notice on the property with photographic evidence satisfies procedural requirements. The solicitor cautioned that hand-delivering notices to an owner's current residence is optional and, if used inconsistently, could create legal challenges by establishing a different procedural precedent.
Council discussed abatement options if violations persist after the notice-and-appeal timeline: limited actions such as mowing, trimming trees obstructing sidewalks and boarding windows could be performed by the village and later assessed to the property through a tax lien process; demolition or structural abatement funded by county programs would require property-ownership or other program-specific eligibility and was not guaranteed.
Council approved motions to proceed with certified notices and directed staff to prepare the paperwork to pursue abatement steps if owners do not respond or correct violations. The meeting record shows affirmative roll-call votes on the enforcement motions.
