Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Versailles council approves four re-plats and grants ADA ramp variance for downtown properties
Summary
The Versailles Village Council approved four Planning Commission re-plats and accepted a Board of Zoning Appeals recommendation allowing an ADA ramp and steps in the N. Center St. right-of-way to serve 13 and 15 N. Center St.; all motions passed unanimously.
The Versailles Village Council approved four re-plats recommended by the Planning Commission and accepted a Board of Zoning Appeals recommendation permitting an ADA ramp and steps in the N. Center Street right-of-way.
Council approved Planning Commission Case No. 25-03, a re-plat of Lot 904 in Heritage Estates No. 3 and Tract 7 (owners Brian J. and Alexis T. Hemmelgarn). The motion was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded by Mrs. Dieringer; the vote was recorded as all yeas.
Council next approved Case No. 25-04, a re-plat of Tract L and a 0.038-acre tract off the south end of Tract M in Elmwood Place for Diana M. Subler. Mr. Steinbrunner moved for approval and Mrs. Dieringer seconded; the motion passed with all yeas.
Case No. 25-05, a re-plat of Lot 905 in Heritage Estates No. 3 and Tract 6 for Daniel P. and Jaqueline K. Watren, was approved on a motion by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Steinbrunner; the vote was all yeas.
Case No. 25-06, a re-plat totaling 5.321 acres owned by Stone Fevre, Inc., was approved following a motion by Mr. Steinbrunner and a second from Mrs. Dieringer; the council recorded all yeas.
Separately, the council approved the Board of Zoning Appeals' written recommendation in BZA Case No. 25-10. Center & Main, LLC requested a variance to construct an ADA ramp and steps that would be built in the public right-of-way of N. Center St. to serve 13 and 15 N. Center St.; Mr. Griesdorn moved approval and Ms. Shaffer seconded; the vote was all yeas.
The approvals were routine administrative actions accepting the planning and zoning boards' recommendations; the minutes do not record conditions attached to the approvals or additional engineering requirements. The council did not discuss any appeals or remands for these items during the meeting.
