Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board closes public hearing on pet-care noise hours and directs attorneys to revise draft law

Village of Mamaroneck Board of Trustees · September 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees continued a public hearing on amendments governing pet-care/daycare special permits and noise hours. The zoning board asked the village to narrow enforcement hours for facilities within 100 feet of residences; the trustees directed attorneys to incorporate the zoning-board changes and return a revised draft.

The board reopened a continuation of a public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 342 (special-permit requirements) for pet-care facilities and related uses. The zoning board had recommended limiting the hours when pet-care noise audible beyond a property line would be prohibited, with suggested quiet-hour windows beginning at 6 or 7 p.m. and extending into the morning.

The hearing included technical questions about enforceability and measurement method: some speakers urged replacing a bark-count rule (e.g., "10 animal noises per minute over a 6-minute period") with a decibel-based standard, while others noted practical enforcement limits for police and code officers.

Andrew Spatz, who spoke to the board as counsel for an interested party, asked the trustees to treat the M1 industrial area differently because lot lines there can be immediately adjacent to residences; he also recommended incorporating existing decibel rules in the code rather than relying on a bark-count approach.

After discussion the board voted to close the public hearing and directed the village attorneys to prepare revised language that incorporates the zoning-board suggestions (hours, adjacent-property threshold and related clarifications) and to return the revised draft for scheduling of a public hearing at the next meeting cycle.