Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Financing Transition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board endorses financing-review findings, urges portfolio approach and demand avoidance
Summary
The board affirmed Financing the Transition findings: a portfolio of financing tools and new revenue sources should be explored but the highest-return approach is avoiding infrastructure spend through demand-side measures; members urged equity protections and legislative outreach.
The Energy Advisory Board voted to affirm a final report from its Financing the Transition (FTT) working group that evaluated a range of options to reduce the ratepayer burden of grid and distribution investments.
FTT members and technical analysts presented a 23-criteria assessment of financing alternatives (securitization, clean-energy distribution tariffs, public-private partnerships, transition bonds, state revolving funds, and broader climate funds or fees). The group concluded that no single financing tool is sufficient by itself, and recommended a portfolio approach that pairs financing techniques with demand-avoidance strategies.
Presenters and analysts emphasized that the single most effective way to reduce long-term costs for ratepayers is to avoid spending in the first place: targeted demand reduction and non-wires alternatives can reduce the need for large distribution upgrades. The FTT report also recommended engineering social-equity protections up front and modeling unintended consequences of tools such as securitization.
Members urged timely communications to the Legislature and regulators, noting that several proposals currently under consideration could affect affordability. The board approved the FTT findings with several abstentions; staff said recorded materials and an accompanying quantitative appendix will be posted and that a webinar and briefings for legislative offices are planned.
