Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wyoming workforce agency asks council to shift more federal job funds to state operations
Summary
The Department of Workforce Services urged the Workforce Development Council to alter its WIOA funding split so the agency controls a larger share of multi-year federal funds, citing sharply higher client demand and shortfalls in expiring program-year dollars. Council members pressed for more detailed budget projections before a vote scheduled the next day.
The Department of Workforce Services asked the Wyoming Workforce Development Council on May 11 to change how federal WIOA funds are allocated, saying the agency needs greater control of multi-year grant dollars to meet surging demand.
"We are serving more clients — this year alone we will serve over twice what we did in the last two years," Director Robin Kolie told the council, arguing that moving more of the three-year allotment into the agency budget would let staff plan and avoid an involuntary "order of priorities" that could leave many clients without services. Kolie cited rising local costs ("we're now paying $80,000 for our lease space in Jackson") and the planned implementation of a new, in-house MIS that she said will save the agency “hundreds of thousands of dollars" over time.
Kolie asked that the council reduce its historical 15% "set-aside" and align allocations with how money has actually been spent; the materials provided to members proposed a council share near 8.8% for program year 2023 and comparable reallocations for 2021–22. Kolie's memo — prepared by agency staff and shared in the council's meeting folder — recommends the change so the agency can budget for youth, adult and dislocated worker services across program years instead of racing to spend funds at the end of a grant cycle.
Several council members said they understood agency pressures but urged caution. "When we went through that 10% cut it was detrimental to the council," said long-serving member Jim Engle, who recalled previous periods when reduced set-asides forced deep belt-tightening. Member Stacy voiced concern that cutting council resources could undercut growing initiatives such as the NextGen sector partnerships and other projects the council has helped seed.
Other members pushed back on the timing. "The timing of this decision seems a little quick for us as a council," Chair Fabian Laera said, noting turnover on the board and the value of broader member input. Members asked staff for more detail on how the reallocation would affect travel, operating budgets and discretionary project pools the council has historically used.
Staff and subcommittee chairs said the Strategic Performance and Finance Committee reviewed the topic and forwarded it for full-council consideration. Robert Short, the subcommittee chair, said the committee neither unanimously supported nor opposed the proposal but wanted the full council to weigh the trade-offs.
No final action was taken on May 11; the chair said a roll-call vote was planned for the council's next session the following day. If the council approves the change, it would shift a larger share of WIOA Title I resources to agency-managed budgets intended for direct services and program implementation rather than council discretionary spending.
The council's discussion made clear the competing priorities: the agency says it needs stable multiyear budgeting to avoid limiting services for veterans and the most-in-need clients; council members worry about losing the ability to fund strategic initiatives and discretionary projects that the council has supported in past years. Council staff committed to provide additional expenditure and program data before the scheduled vote.
