Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Funding Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Workforce council approves revised funding model over objections about one‑stop efficiency and oversight
Summary
After hours of debate and a failed motion to table, the Council approved a DWS proposal to shift more WIOA/WEOA grant money toward operations and participants and reduce the council's reserve. The vote carried 16–5 following requests for more program data and possible efficiency reviews of one‑stop centers.
The Wyoming Workforce Development Council voted to adopt a revised funding model proposed by Department of Workforce Services staff after an extended debate over timing, transparency and operational efficiency.
Trevor, a DWS presenter, said the recommendation reallocates more grant funds to participant services and local workforce center operations and cited repeated end‑of‑year spending mismatches under the current model. He referenced federal guidance limiting Council reserves, citing 20 CFR 683.120(b), and argued the change would prevent case managers from having to implement "priority of service" rationing when funds run short.
Council members raised competing concerns. Jim Engle moved to table the proposal and asked the executive committee to commission a third‑party review of one‑stop center efficiency; proponents of the motion said additional data on overhead, participant costs and local service delivery were needed before making a major allocation change. Opponents warned that tabling could disrupt DWS operations and delay access to program year funds; staff noted federal spending deadlines and multiple existing state and federal audits.
After the tabling motion failed, the Council conducted a roll‑call vote and approved the funding‑model recommendation by a 16–5 margin. Members who opposed the change called for follow‑up reporting on participant outcomes and granular budget details; proponents said the Council retains the ability to revisit the allocation in later years and that the executive committee can act midyear if shortfalls occur.
DWS also provided average per‑participant cost benchmarks during the discussion: roughly $4,000–4,500 for career services and about $7,000–7,500 for training for dislocated workers, with youth training averaging higher. Staff said the agency would continue pursuing grant opportunities and operational efficiencies—highlighting an MIS upgrade expected to reduce annual maintenance costs once implemented.
The Council approved the funding model for program years 2021–2023 and authorized DWS to use the allocations as presented. Members asked staff to supply follow‑up data on cost allocations, rent/overhead splits, and participant outcomes before the next funding‑model review.
