Get email alerts on the Waterfront Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board reviews two Chapter 91 waterfront applications, authorizes staff sign-off
Summary
The board reviewed Chapter 91 (waterfront) license applications for 6 Cap'n Doane and 13 Port Way, heard that conservation and harbor master conditions were met, and authorized staff sign-off unless members request a public hearing.
Get email alerts on the Waterfront Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff presented two Chapter 91 license reviews for waterfront work at 6 Cap'n Doane and 13 Port Way and the board authorized staff to sign the planning-board endorsement for the applications.
Staff described the 6 Cap'n Doane proposal as a "raise and replace" with a new landing, ramp and floats, dredging and a rebuilt bulkhead; the harbor master and conservation commission conditions were reported as satisfied. For 13 Port Way staff said the property is also proposing a new ramp, piles and floats after a recent raise-and-replace project and that conservation and harbor master review were complete.
The board discussed whether any member wanted a public hearing for either application. Staff noted that most technical reviews are addressed through the conservation commission and harbor master, but the planning board could request a public hearing if concerns exist. Following that exchange the board voted to allow the planning board signatory (Paul) to sign off on the Chapter 91 applications unless a member asked for a hearing.
The chair summarized that this step records the planning board’s review for state Chapter 91 licensing and does not substitute for conservation or harbor master approvals.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
