Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Lottery topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public raises concerns about housing lottery and local SHI counts; committee asks staff for flowchart and memo

Zoning Bylaw Study Committee · October 24, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A public questioner and committee members flagged community confusion over how lottery allocations and the state SHI (Subsidized Housing Inventory) count units, urged streamlining regional tenant lists and suggested temporary deed restrictions; staff agreed to draft a flowchart and memo for the next meeting.

During public comment at the Oct. 24 meeting a resident asked whether the housing lottery and the state’s inventory process meaningfully deliver housing to local residents, prompting a broad committee discussion of eligibility lists, deed‑restriction terms and workforce housing credit.

The speaker asked how the lottery math works and whether the 25% allocation in some developments and lottery procedures actually reserve units for Dennis residents. Committee members and staff acknowledged the process can be cumbersome: Paul Foley and others described a complex approval and lottery system, and several members urged creation of a regional or town‑level ready list to match available units with qualified applicants more quickly.

"The system is very cumbersome, both for the people trying to get a unit and people trying to find people to get their units," one committee member said, suggesting a regional coordinator to maintain a real‑time eligible list.

Members also discussed whether deed restrictions could be time‑limited (for example, qualified for a fixed period instead of permanent restrictions) so more apartments could qualify for the state list while addressing owner concerns about permanent affordability covenants. The committee noted that many workforce or near‑affordable apartments exist locally but are not counted because they are not deed‑restricted.

Actions and next steps: the committee asked staff to draft a flowchart explaining the lottery and SHI eligibility process, and asked Paul Foley and other staff to prepare a memo on possible short‑term deed‑restriction models and options to increase workforce housing counts. The committee will address these materials at a future meeting, and members suggested inviting regional housing‑authority staff or Cape Cod Commission officials to brief the committee.