Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sewer Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Haven officials warn sewer fund is insolvent; $5.4M upgrade identified as likely need
Summary
Presenters told the budget committee sewer operations are running a structural shortfall and reserves are exhausted; immediate request is $60,000 from taxpayers to cover operations and Aler Associates estimates $5.4 million for necessary sewer-treatment upgrades.
Get email alerts on the Sewer Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenters told the North Haven budget committee on Jan. 15 that the sewer department is operating with a structural funding gap and that existing reserves are effectively exhausted.
Officials said the sewer department—urrently needs about $260,000 annually to run operations; typical collections from user rates were described as roughly $200,000 to $202,000, leaving a current operating shortfall of about $60,000 that the proposer recommended be covered by taxation for the upcoming year. The presenter said chemical, labor, transportation and regulatory costs have risen and that wastewater treatment rules will require new investments.
Longer-term capital: the presenter said Aler Associates identified approximately $5.4 million in necessary upgrades to the sewer treatment facility. The presenter said the town may have about $1.1 million in earmarked funds and noted the staff is pursuing grants (including a mention of Northern Borders and other grant programs) and using in-kind staff time to meet match requirements. "We have possibly have year mark funds um in the amount of $1.1 million ... we are meeting with d to look at Grants," the presenter said.
On rates and authority: staff said a rate study by Aler Associates is underway but will not be completed before town meeting; any changes in user rates must be approved by the Public Utilities Commission (as noted during the discussion).
What the committee will do next: the budget committee scheduled additional meetings to review the sewer and water budgets in detail; staff were directed to continue grant-seeking and to prepare a clear financing plan that separates operating support, reserve replenishment and capital financing for public review ahead of the March 5 public hearing.
Caveats: the $5.4 million figure was described by staff as an estimate from engineering consultants and had not been voted on by the board; several grant and matching funds remain prospective.

